Traverse City has an incredible
tradition of excellence in choral music. Mel Larimer, one of the
godfathers of TC choirs in the public schools, died a few years back.
His son and others created an annual choral festival in his honor.
This year that festival blew up.
We have a deep divide in our country.
I refer not to the conservative/liberal divide, but to the
Christian/Not Church divide. Like the political divide, people do
not communicate across the Christian/Not Church divide. They get
their information from different sources with different slants. Each side mystifies other. Like in the political divide, each
side in this one cannot believe THOSE PEOPLE think/believe/act the way they do.
This
year, the Mel Larimer choral festival featured a work that included
elements from different religions. Among these was an Islamic call
to prayer that mentioned Allah by name. The composer wanted to
create a piece that would advocate for peace. It caused a local war.
A Christian church hosted the event. When the church's leaders
learned of the call to Allah they asked the conductor to delete it
from the performance. He argued to keep it, but eventually agreed
not to. Then, out of concern that he not upset his students, he did
not tell them. Finally, shortly before the opening performance, he
announced the change. A Muslim girl in the choir became upset. Her
family contacted a reporter. The local paper, always happy to rouse
the rabble, put it on the front page with a totally misleading,
incendiary headline.
Now
we have almost daily letters to the editor from people on the Not
Church side of the divide. Without exception they take a superior
tone, scolding the church for being prejudiced, closed-minded, haters.
The idea that a Christian church might choose not to permit the name
of Allah to be extolled in its sanctuary does not strike these people
as permissible. Christians must submit these days to progressive
cultural values, among them the idea that all religions have equal
value. (Of course, for many of these people the “equal value” is
zero.) Truth is whatever works for you. Judgment can flow only in
one direction: from culture to religion, never vice versa.
I
have followed this story closely. The problem is not that the church
asked not to have Allah mentioned, but that the choir director failed
to handle their request in a timely fashion. I know him. He's a
great guy. He's smart. He genuinely cares for his students and for
the music. But he probably just wished the whole thing would go
away. When it didn't and the clock ran out, he had a “Houston, we
have a problem” moment.
But
in the aftermath the Not Church folks are using this as yet another
lever to get Christianity pried out of our communal life. It would
be sad, unconstitutional and even tragic should they succeed. I ask
not, “Can't we all just get along?” but, “Did I miss the
meeting where we all decided together to boot Christianity from our
civic life?”
God
knows, we Christians are not perfect. Many of us defended slavery.
Some of us are busy killing Muslims in Africa (and the Muslims are busily
returning the favor). We're all hypocrites, Christians included.
But we Christians have given deeply and foundationally to our
society. Had we never allowed Christianity in we would have half as many
hospitals and colleges, and an even coarser culture. We have the
right to be Christians, particularly within our sanctuaries.
Christians:
stand up for your beliefs but respect others and their beliefs.
Others: please reciprocate.
Hmmm. Hmmm. This sort of scenario is why I think the separation of church and state is unfortunately a good practice to follow (although I have no opinion on whether it is or is not constitutional). In my opinion, it shouldn't be a problem if a student in a performance wants to call upon someone who is theoretically the same God that Christians worship. On the other hand, a church has every right as a private institution to say that they don't want that happening within their walls. The problem is that if a student at a public school is forced to participate in this concert, and the venue is the church, and the church is dictating what can and cannot be in the program, then a private institution is placing itself in a point of control over the education of a public citizen who may not him or herself be Christian. It's messy. Ideally everyone would be tolerant of each other, realistically that doesn't happen and it's best to allow churches to live and proliferate freely in a separate space where people can choose whether they want to be present or not. Just my 2 cents. Obviously I don't want Christianity pushed out of society, but in some sense I think it should represent a cleanly separate entity from the public sector. [Posting and ducking]...
ReplyDeleteIt IS messy, isn't it? That's why I wrote about it. This situation illustrates one of the most difficult, and important, conflicts of our day. As one person said to me, "That student has sung Christian songs for years in that choir." As another has said, "Everybody's wrong in this one." I say, the separation of church and state is meant to prevent the establishment of a state religion, not the eradication of religion from public life. Anybody who disagrees is going to have to read all the history and biographies I have read before I can take them seriously.
ReplyDelete